Open joelkohler opened 1 year ago
At the protocol level each box is configured as a separate command, but this library may not be allowing for those commands to be sent in the same packets, which is suboptimal.
So I think the solution here is for the currently private sendCommands
method to be made public and to be verified to be performant. Then as a user you will have to manually create instantiate the command classes you wish to send and provide them to that method.
Perhaps a 'command batching' api would be nice to have in the future?
Yes that would be very great.
In v3.4.0 it is now possible to batch commands using the sendCommands
method, but it requires constructing the command classes manually.
In the future a 'command batching' api can be added to make this easier to achieve
It works, thx!
I'm submitting a ... [ ] bug report [x ] feature request [ ] question about the decisions made in the repository [ ] question about how to use this project
Summary I want to make an animated box transition for SuperSources. For the performance I need to set all box parameters from one or all SuperSources at one time.