search

nroduit / Weasis

Weasis is a DICOM viewer available as a desktop application or as a web-based application.
https://nroduit.github.io
Other
816 stars 292 forks source link

IMPORT DICOM #510

Closed drabinashsingh closed 7 months ago

drabinashsingh commented 9 months ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? (optional)

SEARCH CRITERIA TAB NEEDS TO BE MORE USER FRIENDLY AND EASILY ACCESSIBLE. ( SEE THE INTERFACE OF RADIANT VIEWER)

Description of the new feature/enhancement

IN THE DICOM SOURCE PAGE THERE SHOULD BE SEARCH CRIETERIA. IT IS WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY TO USE 2 TABS FOR THE SAME THING EVERYTIME.

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

No response

Describe alternatives you've considered (optional)

No response

Additional context (optional)

No response

unsafeunaudited commented 8 months ago

Welcome!

@drabinashsingh Kindly edit your post as all caps text is considered uncultured and very much rude in online conversation.

With regards to "search criteria tab should be more user friendly" you did not even specify on how to fix the problem. Simply asking to copy a competing product is infringement on the copyright of Radiant. Also if you like Radiant so much, you should keep using it as it is a paid product and Weasis is volunteer work.

Saying that Weasis wastes your time and energy is quite a thing to say to the face of the dev of a volunteer product.

The dev owes you nothing. Period.

nroduit commented 8 months ago

I share the comments above made by @unsafeunaudited.

In addition, the DICOM Query/Retrieve section is a secondary addition to the interface, to cover all methods of retrieving data from a PACS. However, the preferred way of using Weasis is to search in a third-party portal (Patient Record, PACS, VNA, RIS...) and then retrieve data with pacs-connector integration or directly in DICOMWeb.

nroduit commented 7 months ago

Your issue is written in all caps, which is generally considered shouting in online communication. This isn't constructive or helpful to the project. Moreover, the arguments lack objective elements.

We're closing this issue.