I'm a big fan of monorepo and now I have a website I can share with people when they're new to the concept.
As per subject, I'd love to add a row (probably in the manageable section?) to the tools review table to explain which tools support more than one language out of the box.
I think that's critical when evaluating monorepo when multiple programming languages are involved (I wrote about this here) and the only thing I feel it's missing to fully capture the state of monorepo tooling.
If you like the idea, I can contribute to it myself (I would love to!). I would call the row "polyglot" but that clashes with existing terminology so I'd probably use "multi-language" (or whatever you find more appropriate).
First of all, let me thank you for this project!
I'm a big fan of monorepo and now I have a website I can share with people when they're new to the concept.
As per subject, I'd love to add a row (probably in the manageable section?) to the tools review table to explain which tools support more than one language out of the box.
I think that's critical when evaluating monorepo when multiple programming languages are involved (I wrote about this here) and the only thing I feel it's missing to fully capture the state of monorepo tooling.
If you like the idea, I can contribute to it myself (I would love to!). I would call the row "polyglot" but that clashes with existing terminology so I'd probably use "multi-language" (or whatever you find more appropriate).