Container consistency policy - Githubissues

nspcc-dev / neofs-api

NeoFS API documentation and proto files declaration

Apache License 2.0

11 stars 15 forks source link

Container consistency policy #300

Closed roman-khimov closed 1 month ago

roman-khimov commented 5 months ago

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I'm always frustrated when we can't specify consistency policy for a container.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add an optional enum field with the following options:

available (just like the old one, no meta)
strict (nodes use meta and wait for meta acceptance)
optimistic (nodes use meta, but do not wait for acceptance)

Describe alternatives you've considered

If we want to alternate between different modes and preserve compatibility, there are not a lot of them.

roman-khimov commented 1 month ago

CC @EESergey. This can be an attribute.