Open carpawell opened 8 months ago
These are very different things. node->storage is mostly blocked by potential compatibility issues. morph
client isn't really needed. fs chain can be renamed right away.
morph client isn't really needed
Do you know what is it?
fs chain can be renamed right away
"sidechain" wording used in logs. Why is it better to do this than binary renaming? Both are smth that can be used by a user. Well, binary is more probable but still.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm always frustrated when i see the same thing named two different ways.
Describe the solution you'd like
neofs-node
->neofs-storage
everywheremorph
client -> ???sidechain
/morph
->neofs chain
Describe alternatives you've considered
Do nothing cause we may break something.