Closed willingc closed 2 years ago
@alexeyraspopov & I have been discussing it and we feel like combining the main repo and the docs repo is the way to go. So, unless anyone has a compelling counterargument, that's how we're going to do it.
There are several benefits from having docs as a part of main repo I see:
I was planning to open a PR to pull the docs in this repo, possibly preserving git history.
I agree. Let's do it.
Decision made to create a monorepo. @alexeyraspopov will get us started on combining the repos.
@emeeks I tried to figure out which branch of semiotic-docs to pull in, and I'm not sure: semiotic-2
has changes that are not in main and possibly does not have some changes from main
Do you remember any specific items from main
branch that can possibly be cherry-picked to semiotic-2
?
@alexeyraspopov I did an interactive rebase of the branches in the semiotic-docs repo. This branch (semi-together) should resolve conflicts with main and have the 4 commits ahead from semiotic-2. Building the styleguidist docs works from head of the semi-together branch.
@willingc, the branch looks good, I'll use it for migration. Thanks!
The PR is ready: https://github.com/nteract/semiotic/pull/578
As we move to 2.0 and beyond, let's take a look at modernizing our documentation toolchain and content.
Possible ideas and random thoughts (please share more in the chat):
FYI @emeeks @alexeyraspopov David Gwer (asked status on Slack)