pf_ ring usage problem

[dreamhighhd]

Can you provide a copy of PF_ Ring, combined with nprobe and ntopng, is facing the large traffic network environment.

The problems I now encounter:

1. Since the third-party single-mode module used for 10 Gigabit network card is the network card identified by default, the network card identified by the following methods

rmmod ixgbe
modprobe ixgbe allow_ unsupported_ sfp=1,1

2. Install PF_ After ring, due to the adjustment of network card driver, it is incompatible with the third-party network card module. It is successfully identified in the following ways

rmmod ixgbe_ zc
modprobe ixgbe_ zc allow_ unsupported_ sfp=1,1

3、pf_ Ring and ntopng usage problems (it's uncertain whether it's a configuration problem, it can't solve the problem of inaccurate display of my traffic, and ntopng can't automatically create sub interfaces for VLAN)

[dreamhighhd]

The pfcount test seems to work properly

pfcount -i zc:enp2s0f0

[dreamhighhd]

@jnicholls @thus @sfd @TheHippo The pfcount test seems to work properly

[dreamhighhd]

8255 chip network card

[dreamhighhd]

The real traffic of network card image is about 5-6GB, and the traffic may be greater in the later stage

[dreamhighhd]

present situation： Flow comparison on network port:

                                            VLAN123 VLAN234 VLAN345

Real traffic of service switch: 2.8G 1.4G 1.4G

Traffic received by the server: 2.7G 1.4G 1.4G

Ntopng displayed flow: 700M 1G 400M

The ntopng agent reported that it was unable to handle the problem and asked to increase PF_ Ring to see if it can be solved. At this stage, the support is poor, and the problem has not been solved after several months of communication. I hope the manufacturer can solve the problem more closely.

[dreamhighhd]

@cardigliano

[cardigliano]

@dreamhighhd is this still an open issue? Could you update on the current status?