Author analysis GIScience vs. AGILE

nuest / reproducible-research-at-giscience

https://nuest.github.io/reproducible-research-at-giscience/

Apache License 2.0

2 stars 0 forks source link

Author analysis GIScience vs. AGILE #2

Closed nuest closed 3 years ago

nuest commented 3 years ago

See https://github.com/nuest/reproducible-research-at-giscience/blob/master/author_analysis/BibTex_handling.ipynb

Tasks

[x] get notebook to work within the same Binder (uses Dockerfile) @nuest
[x] fix LaTeX artifact for Umlaut and special characters from the LIPIcs bibtex file, e.g. {\"{o}} (probably best handled by changing the bib file manually?) @nuest
[x] redo retrieval @cgranell

Questions

[x] @foost Can you clarify in the notebook where the file GIScience_Conference_2018.bib originates from? The other .bib files seem to be results of the Scopus search.

nuest commented 3 years ago

Thanks @foost

I can now also run the notebook locally with Binder thanks to https://github.com/nuest/reproducible-research-at-giscience/commit/e7264730e2a8c658720bddc8f72e47132f87b9e5

nuest commented 3 years ago

@foost Any idea why worboys appears several times in the list?

cgranell commented 3 years ago

I ran the search queries on Scopus. The AGILE query appears to retrieve all LNCG books (and individual papers) from 2007 to today. Results from the GIScience query are a bit odd. Two years do not works as expected: 2014 (3 records) and 2004 (1 record).

nuest commented 3 years ago

Thanks for checking Carlos - I think if we miss the full records only for two years (which are quite far apart) that is something we can live with.