Program Icon Proposals - Githubissues

OpenRift412 commented 6 months ago

I made a few icons that you're welcome to use in future releases and such. Thoughts?

Full size: icon_fullsize

64x64: icon_64x64

32x32: icon_32x32

32x32 (alternative): icon_32x32_alt

16x16: icon_16x16

elf-alchemist commented 6 months ago

I support this proposal

OpenRift412 commented 5 months ago

Compiled the actual ico files last night, each with a different 32x32 variant.

icons.zip

000MDK commented 5 months ago

16x16 improved: 16 x 16 - BMP (32-bit) 32x32_b improved (still like your _a with levels better though): 32 x 32 - BMP (32-bit) 64x64 has unreadable "S" in many situations (tested with Win11) - altered some pixels but did not improve much: 64 x 64 - BMP (32-bit) 256x256 added: 256 x 256 - BMP (32-bit) 512x12 added (Roland logo removed from box) (github compressed the edge-transparency real bad, check the ico): 512 x 512 - PNG

Suggestions: -drop variant esp. 64x64 and maybe also 32x32 for not looking all too good when rendered in UI -512 is too big and I don't like that style anyways -256x256 might be useful for a macOS .icns later edit: and I should have made it with Roland digital camouflage instead of black background

->16x16 works in any situation very well and is small in size - best choice to only use that variant imho

.ico-file: app.ico.zip

now-its-dark commented 5 months ago

hiya! if you're interested, I've put together a couple pixel art renderings of the device. SC_multi

The resolutions were chosen fit w/ standard icon sizes, with a crop in sub-64x64 sizes. Here is a 4x export, for easier viewing in-browser. SC_multi-4xt

The markings indicate how much space beyond the image is available, when displayed at the labelled resolutions.

If needed, I could adjust the sizes, or create an additional variant at a new size also.

OpenRift412 commented 5 months ago

hiya! if you're interested, I've put together a couple pixel art renderings of the device.

The resolutions were chosen fit w/ standard icon sizes, with a crop in sub-64x64 sizes. Here is a 4x export, for easier viewing in-browser.

The markings indicate how much space beyond the image is available, when displayed at the labelled resolutions.

If needed, I could adjust the sizes, or create an additional variant at a new size also.

WOW, these look incredible! I'd say definitely use these over my 64x64 icon, 100%.

000MDK commented 5 months ago

stopping as per comment from nukeykt

....

converted versions from @now-its-dark -- without transparent glow it doesn't look as good, so removed it
96x96 does not scale very well (note) 96x96 is only shown in Windows-UI when it's the biggest size present (Win10+Win11 1080p 100%)
transparent Glow only works with 512x512/png
added a 512 with and without glow, and a pixelart version of a real device (note) 512x512 is only shown in Windows-UI when there is no 256x256 present (Win10+Win11 1080p 100%)
is it really a good idea to add 150kb ico to a 100kb binary?

which icons are used where anyways?

[Win10+Win11 1080p 100%] 16x16,32x32,48x48 and 256x256 are the sizes Windows prefers at least in two different locations each and 24x24 only once

.PNGs:

16x16 16 x 16 - BMP (32-bit) 32x32 32 x 32 - BMP (32-bit) 64x64 64 x 64 - BMP (32-bit) 96x96 96 x 96 - BMP (32-bit) 512x512 no-glow 512 x 512 - PNG 512x512 glow 512 x 512 - glow 512x512 pixelart 512 x 512 - PNG (2)

nukeykt / Nuked-SC55

Program Icon Proposals #1

is it really a good idea to add 150kb ico to a 100kb binary?

which icons are used where anyways?

.PNGs: