Closed alexrudd2 closed 2 years ago
Closes #5
Looks good to me!
I don't know why asyncio moved to this pattern as it's messier than the old one, but that's outside the scope of this PR.
Looks good to me! I don't know why asyncio moved to this pattern as it's messier than the old one, but that's outside the scope of this PR.
My guess is they wanted more granularity, since the new class allows for multiple timeout types. /shrug
Closes #5