[Community Review] Pre-discussion: 7th NumbersDAO voting topic community review

[Steffdarz]

Topic: Archiving Controversial Events Happenings Around The World and Grant Funding

Overview

Dear Numbers DAO, I hope everyone is doing well. As we all know, Numbers Protocol has been archiving important events around the world as a way to preserve and access critical historical information. In this process, we have steered clear of controversial topics to maintain neutrality and avoid any political stance that may accompany them.

However, one of our core beliefs in designing the Numbers Protocol is to utilize cutting-edge technology to preserve humanity for future generations. In the digital era, it's a common misconception that files and memories will always remain accessible; however, the reality is quite the contrary. The digital preservation we have today represents just a brief period in history, and it is crucial that we prepare for the needs of future generations.

With this concept in mind, we are open to embracing diverse content, including the same events captured from different perspectives. This aligns with our commitment to not only maintain neutrality but also to recognize the importance of content diversity and freedom of expression. For this reason, I would like to propose the following topic for our next DAO voting:

"Should Numbers open for controversial archive proposals from the community, and set grants for it?"

The primary objective of this proposal is to enhance user acquisition. By embracing a broader range of content, including controversial topics, and incentivizing their archive through grants, we anticipate increased participation, debate, and interest in Numbers Protocol.

In the following sections, we will outline the benefits and address concerns that may come up if this proposal is approved. We aim to provide you with an impartial analysis that equips you with the necessary information to understand the dialogue that will take place during the upcoming DAO meeting. Remember, this writing is not meant to sway your opinion but rather to foster dialogue and broaden our collective understanding.

I encourage each of you to share your perspectives, raise pertinent questions, and engage in open dialogue, as it is your active participation that strengthens the very fabric of our DAO.

Pros

1. Increased Engagement: Controversial topics often drive higher engagement, leading to more active community discussions and content creation.
2. Diverse Perspectives: This initiative can position Numbers as a platform for a wide spectrum of views, attracting users from various backgrounds.
3. Media Attention: The bold move to archive controversial content could garner media interest, increasing visibility and user acquisition.
4. Community Growth: Grants for archiving such content can incentivize new and existing users to contribute, fostering community growth.

Risks and Challenges

1. Content Moderation: Ensuring the content aligns with legal standards and community guidelines will be crucial.
2. Reputational Risk: Handling sensitive or controversial topics may pose reputational risks if not managed properly.
3. Polarization: There's a potential for increased polarization within the community over differing viewpoints.
4. Resource Allocation: Efficient allocation and management of grants will be necessary to ensure the success of this initiative.

Conclusion

We invite all community members to share their thoughts, concerns, and suggestions regarding this proposal. Your input is invaluable for Numbers DAO. Please consider the following points in your feedback:

• Potential impact on user acquisition and community engagement.
• Ideas for effectively managing and moderating controversial content.
• Thoughts on the grant system and its implementation.
• Any concerns or risks you foresee and how we might address them.

It is important to note that Numbers Protocol remains neutral in this discussion and I encourage all stakeholders to engage in open dialogue and share their perspectives.

Together, let us shape the future of Numbers Protocol and work towards a more decentralized and inclusive ecosystem, driven by the collective wisdom of our community. Your voice matters, and I look forward to the outcome of what hopefully is a critical decision in NumbersDAO young history.

Thank you for being an integral part of the Numbers Protocol journey!

Entering Community Review Just like previous DAO meeting topics, this Numbers Governance Proposal will undergo community review for 14 days until March 18. During this time, I encourage the Numbers community to share their thoughts and concerns on GitHub issues and discuss openly on our many social channels regarding this proposal. I look forward to hearing your feedback!

┆Issue is synchronized with this Asana task by Unito

[daredevil8871]

I support archiving controversial events. It promotes a complete historical record and fosters discussion. Let's discuss safeguards for neutrality. Increased user engagement with controversial topics is a great point but How will Numbers ensure efficient grant allocation for controversial content?

[DanielSamuel1]

This topic is sure worth the discussion as it's going to ensure clear definition and guidelines for controversial topics, implement risk mitigation strategies, engage the community effectively, maintain transparency, and assess long-term impact.

[TylerDylan]

I think opening up to archive controversial topics from multiple perspectives is a bold but smart move. It could really drive a ton of new users and engagement to the platform by appealing to people's interests in exploring different views on hot-button issues. Offering grants to incentivize archiving this type of content is also a great way to get the community more involved.

That said, we'd need some robust guardrails in place. Clear guidelines on what's allowed, with no hate speech or illegal stuff. Maybe a community moderator team to review submissions before archiving. And a fair process for appeals if content gets rejected.

For the grants, we should have transparent criteria for evaluating proposals based on things like the event's significance, diversity of perspectives, and quality. Community voting could be one way to allocate grants in a decentralized way.

My main concern would be the potential for backlash or reputation risks if this isn't handled carefully. So a solid crisis communications plan is key. But even more importantly, fostering an environment of respectful dialogue where different views can be explored productively.

If we get this right though, being a neutral hub for archiving all perspectives on controversial topics could be a major differentiator. It aligns with the protocol's mission while opening up amazing user acquisition opportunities. With the right moderation andgrant processes in place, I think the benefits outweigh the risks.

[emmerson121]

Like we know, whatever have advantages must also have disadvantages. It's very cool and fair for Numbers Protocol to archive controversial proposals/events around the world but when it comes to setting grants, the question is for how long?

What are the measures put in place to make it sustainable and free of political control?

I'll suggest we leave out setting grants

[Profkingkeys]

As a community member, I appreciate the thoughtful consideration put into this proposal. Opening up the platform to controversial content can indeed enhance engagement and foster diverse perspectives. However, ensuring robust content moderation and addressing reputational risks are critical aspects that need careful planning.

[Marybeth-Nwachukwu]

Building upon these suggestions, i propose implementing a user education program alongside the controversial topics already. This program could include resources on critical thinking, media literacy, and constructive communication to encourage users to engage thoughtfully with diverse perspectives.

Additionally, i also recommend periodic community feedback sessions to assess the impact of the controversial topics archive and make iterative improvements based on user input. Highlighting the need for proactive communication with the user community, keeping we all informed about changes, updates, and improvements. Encouraging regular meetings, (Ama Session) newsletters, or dedicated communication channels to foster a sense of community involvement and transparency. This would ensure that users feel heard and contribute to building a more inclusive and dynamic platform.

[doanthekhiem]

I support the perspective of opening Numbers Protocol to controversial archive proposals submitted by the community. While I recognize the challenges this presents, I believe the development team and project leadership are capable of thorough risk assessment and professional execution. Choosing an overly cautious path would significantly limit our potential for growth and innovation.

To mitigate risks, it's crucial to establish strict criteria for acceptable controversial proposals. These guidelines would ensure content management and reduce the potential for reputational damage. We can begin with a well-defined set of standards and gradually expand or revise them as the project evolves.

Let me emphasize some key points:

Risk Assessment: A thorough risk assessment process is essential. This involves identifying potential challenges, developing mitigation strategies, and having a crisis plan in place. Content Standards: Clear content guidelines will not only minimize risks but also provide a framework for contributors, creating a more manageable process. Balanced Approach: The key is finding a balance between promoting diverse perspectives and content moderation that maintains the platform's integrity. I trust that the Numbers team possesses the expertise to navigate this bold step successfully.

[BellaCuzy]

🌟 Your voice is crucial in shaping the future of Numbers Protocol! 🌟

Let's come together and contribute to building a decentralized and inclusive ecosystem, driven by the collective wisdom of our community. Your input is invaluable, and I eagerly anticipate the outcome of this pivotal decision in NumbersDAO's journey.

Thank you for being an essential part of the Numbers Protocol journey!

[Tukymakesmusic]

Diving into controversial stuff could bring lots of new folks to Numbers Protocol. Grants for community contributions sound cool too.

But, gotta keep things in check. Clear rules, a team checking things before saving them, and a fair way to appeal rejections would keep things respectful. When handing out grants, let's keep it fair with easy-to-understand rules about the event's importance and having different points of view.

Watch out for problems, though. If we don't handle things right, it might hurt our rep. So, having a plan for when things go south is a must. More importantly, let's keep the vibe chill for everyone to talk openly about different ideas.

If we nail this, Numbers could be the go-to place for all sorts of viewpoints on hot topics. It fits our mission and could get us more users. Just gotta be smart about it.

[Jennifer104]

I support the motion of archiving controversial events.

Preserves historical record: Archiving controversial materials allows for a more complete historical record, enabling future generations to understand the past in all its complexity, even if they disagree with its contents. Open access to information: Granting access to controversial materials facilitates open dialogue, critical thinking, and informed decision-making. It allows individuals to form their own opinions based on the evidence and participate in constructive discourse. Diversity and inclusion: A broad archive can represent the diverse viewpoints and experiences of a community, even if they are unpopular or offensive to some. This fosters inclusivity and understanding of different perspectives.

[heisbright]

As a member of the community, I value the careful thought that went into this suggestion. It is true that allowing contentious content on the site can increase participation and promote a variety of viewpoints. But there are other important issues that require careful consideration, such making sure that content control is robust and handling reputational threats. Expanding on these recommendations, I advocate introducing a user education program in addition to the contentious subjects addressed. Resources on media literacy, constructive communication, and critical thinking might be included in this program to help users interact meaningfully with different viewpoints.

[Karen5-hub]

The DAO topic was well picked but we need to approach it cautiously:

First, we have to ensure that all content meets legal standards and community guidelines. Second, handling sensitive topics could impact our reputation, so we need a plan to address any potential fallout. Third, we must promote respectful dialogue within our community to prevent division over differing opinions. Lastly, we need to manage our resources wisely to support this initiative effectively.

Let's discuss these considerations further.

[Yearner1]

Decisions are for the community and when different voices, opinions and comments are heard, it brings inflow of good ideas and choices for the Numbers protocol, especially during DAO governance

[daredevil8871]

As a member of the Numbers Protocol community, I appreciate the thoughtful consideration given to the proposal to open up controversial archive proposals and provide grants for such endeavours.

While I understand the importance of embracing diverse perspectives and fostering engagement, I also recognize the potential risks. We must proceed cautiously and establish clear guidelines for content moderation to ensure that all archived material aligns with legal standards and community values.

Furthermore, we must carefully consider the potential impact on the reputation of Numbers Protocol and the polarization that may arise within our community as a result of controversial content.

That being said, with careful planning and transparent communication, we can navigate these challenges and harness the benefits of this initiative to enrich our platform and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of historical events.

[Confijoe]

I am in support of Numbers archiving controversial events around the world as it will help to preserve information long term but in no way should Numbers Protocol endorse their stand on any particular issue

[BeegHanty]

Nice topic and plans.. I have a few suggestions to this:

1. Consider expanding archival efforts to include controversial events worldwide and offer grants for their preservation to increase engagement, attract diverse perspectives, gain media attention, and foster community growth.

2. Ensure content moderation to comply with legal standards and community guidelines, mitigate reputational risks, and address the potential for increased polarization within the community.

3. Implement efficient resource allocation to manage grants effectively and support the successful archiving of valuable content.

4. Encourage open dialogue and participation from all stakeholders to shape the future of Numbers Protocol in a decentralized and inclusive manner.

I think if the team implements this, there would be greater chances for success

[savoypetr]

This proposal marks a pivotal moment for Numbers Protocol and our collective journey towards preserving history in all its complexity. Embracing controversial topics with a structured grant system not only broadens our archival spectrum but also underscores our commitment to diversity and free expression. It’s a bold step forward in ensuring that future generations have access to a more complete historical record. I fully support engaging in a thoughtful exploration of this proposal, considering the significant benefits and the challenges it presents. Let's approach this with open minds and a commitment to our core values of neutrality, integrity, and inclusivity.

[Carina470]

Numbers should consider opening up for controversial archive proposals from the community and setting grants for them. This approach can enrich the historical archives and promote inclusivity and diversity in preserving history. It's a great step towards a more inclusive historical record.

[Steffdarz]

Thanks for everyone's input on this topic. We will close this community review and post the recap once it's done!