search

numfocus / outreachy-contributions-2023

This repository will be used to capture Outreachy applicants' contributions during the Applications phase - May-July 2023 Cohort
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
15 stars 4 forks source link

Second contribution by Rufus Godgift #108

Closed Godgiftr closed 1 year ago

Godgiftr commented 1 year ago

Name: Rufus Godgift Projects Analyzed: OpenRefine | Signac Link to OpenRefine Governance model: https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md Link to Signac Governance model: https://www.signac.io/governance/

INTRODUCTION openRefine is a free open-source powerful project developed to manage and clean data for users.

Signac is an open-source software package for managing computational workflows and data associated with scientific research.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TWO GOVERNANCE MODELS. Both Signac and OpenRefine have well-defined governance models that promote community engagement, transparency, and accountability in their decision-making processes.

While there are some similarities between the two models, there are also some notable differences.

In terms of project roles, both models have similar categories of users, contributors, and committees. However, OpenRefine has more specific roles, such as release manager and project director that are not present in Signac's model. This could be because OpenRefine is a more complex project that requires more specific roles to manage it effectively.

The decision-making process in both models is based on community consensus, with decisions being made in a transparent and open fashion. However, there are some differences in the specifics of the decision-making process. For example, Signac has a proposal system in which proposals are submitted by contributors and reviewed by the steering committee before being put to a community vote. OpenRefine, on the other hand, does not have a formal proposal system, but instead relies on community discussions and the steering committee's review of technical proposals.

Voting is also handled differently in the two models. Signac uses a simple majority voting system, while OpenRefine's steering committee votes on proposals and a proposal is approved if it receives a majority of votes. The differences in voting systems could be due to the size and complexity of the projects, as Signac has a smaller community and simpler decision-making process.

In terms of ease of understanding, both models are well-documented and easily accessible. OpenRefine's governance model is particularly well-organized, with clear descriptions of project roles, committees, and decision-making processes on their GitHub channel. Signac's model is also easily accessible, with documentation on their website and GitHub repository.

Overall, both governance models have their strengths and weaknesses. OpenRefine's model is more specific and comprehensive, which could be necessary for managing a more complex project. Signac's model is simpler and more streamlined, which could be better suited for a smaller community.

CONCLUSION It is evident from the analysis that both models have their strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, the choice of which model is better will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the project and its community.

Godgiftr commented 1 year ago

Cc @arliss-NF please review and give your feedback

arliss-NF commented 1 year ago

@Godgiftr - great analysis. You write very well. You have documented some very important concepts related to governance models. Your conclusion is excellent, as the choice of governance model for a project is highly dictated by the uniqueness of the project's community.

Godgiftr commented 1 year ago

Thank you for your response. I am glad you find my analysis good. I would love to keep contributing to Numfocus even after this contribution stage for Outreachy. Will that be possible?

Thanks. Rufus Godgift

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023, 3:20 PM arliss-NF @.***> wrote:

Closed #108 https://github.com/numfocus/outreachy-contributions-2023/issues/108 as completed.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/numfocus/outreachy-contributions-2023/issues/108#event-8906513468, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6LWPGRVPIPGD4RPHYILRP3W7GDJZANCNFSM6AAAAAAWAMJJ2Q . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: <numfocus/outreachy-contributions-2023/issue/108/issue_event/8906513468@ github.com>