search

numfocus / outreachy-contributions-2023

This repository will be used to capture Outreachy applicants' contributions during the Applications phase - May-July 2023 Cohort
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
15 stars 4 forks source link

Second Contribution by Qudirah Alimi #111

Open Qudirah opened 1 year ago

Qudirah commented 1 year ago

Name: Qudirah Alimi Projects: HoloViz | PySal Links: PySal Governance Model

Introduction

PySal uses both a hierarchical and democratic governance model. The hierarchical part relies on a top-down approach, with decisions being made by a Benevolent Dictator for life. In contrast, democratic governance models prioritize participation and decision-making by the steering councils albeit too small in number in my opinion. Holoviz uses a consensus-based governance model that requires decision-making through consensus, where everyone in the group must agree on a particular decision or course of action. This model emphasizes collaboration and cooperation over competition and individualism.

Similarities

  1. Both projects involve a group of people who are responsible for making decisions related to the project.
  2. Both projects aim to create a collaborative and inclusive environment where all members have a say in decision-making.
  3. Both projects strive to balance individual interests with the interests of the wider community.

Differences

  1. Holoviz, as a shared governance model, involves equal representation from all stakeholders which might take some time because a deadlock might be reached. In contrast, PySal, as a combined governance model, involves a single person making final decisions when the council is at a deadlock.
  2. Holoviz encourages a whole more diversity in decision making while that isn’t so possible for PySal.

My opinion on which model is better:

PySal’s model is better in my opinion. In order to foster a collaborative atmosphere where everyone feels heard and included, Holoviz’s consensus governance approach works wonders. Everyone’s participation in the decision-making process can also result in better decisions. Yet, because members might not always concur on the optimal course of action, this arrangement might occasionally result in deadlock. Consensus-based models emphasize collaboration and cooperation, but can also lead to a lack of accountability and indecisiveness. PySal’s combined governance model, on the other hand, ensures excellence at making quick decisions and ensuring that the project continues on course. Maintaining a distinct vision for the project might also be beneficial. This strategy also sees that the model has some elements of a democratic governance model, where the steering council makes decisions through consensus while considering input from the community. The model is based on openness and transparency, which helps to build trust between the community and the project's leadership. The only problem I can point to here is the number of steering councils being too small and as such diversity in decision-making cannot be guaranteed.

Qudirah commented 1 year ago

@arliss-NF I am through with the second work.