Second Contribution by Emile-Daisy

[12Daisy]

Name: Emile-Daisy Project Analyzed: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/#the-django-open-source-project | https://openjsf.org/ Link to the The Django open-source project Governance Model: https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2020/mar/12/governance/ Link to the OpenJS Governance Model: https://openjsf.org/about/governance/

I will analyze Django open-source project and OpenJS open source projects to draw a comparative analysis between their governance models.

Django Django is an open-source web framework written in Python that allows developers to build web applications quickly and efficiently. It provides a set of tools and libraries that enable developers to create scalable, secure, and maintainable web applications. Being an open-source framework, Django is freely available and can be used, modified, and distributed by anyone. The source code of Django is openly available for anyone to view, study, and contribute to, which has led to a vibrant community of developers who continue to improve and enhance the framework. Django is used by many well-known companies, including Instagram, Pinterest, and Mozilla, to build their web applications. Its popularity is due to its ease of use, robustness, and flexibility, making it an ideal choice for building complex web applications.

OpenJS OpenJS is a community-driven open-source organization that supports the development and maintenance of JavaScript projects and related technologies. It was created in 2019 when the Node.js Foundation merged with the JS Foundation. OpenJS provides a home for projects such as Node.js, jQuery, Dojo, and many others. The goal of OpenJS is to foster collaboration and growth within the JavaScript ecosystem by providing resources and support for developers, contributors, and users. The organization offers various services, including project governance, legal and financial support, and community events, to ensure that projects remain sustainable and vibrant over time.

Project Overview It is clear from the foregoing that both communities are well-established in the open source world. Although both Django open-source project and OpenJS are open-source projects, their governance models differ significantly.

Differences OpenJS and Django are two popular open-source projects with different governance models. OpenJS is a project under the umbrella of the OpenJS Foundation, a non-profit organization that aims to support the growth and sustainability of JavaScript and web technologies. OpenJS has a collaborative governance model that involves a Technical Steering Committee (TSC) responsible for the technical direction of the project and a Board of Directors responsible for the strategic direction of the project. The TSC oversees the project's working groups, which are responsible for specific areas of the project, such as testing, documentation, and security. OpenJS also has a Code of Conduct that sets expectations for behavior and outlines consequences for violations. On the other hand, Django is an independent open-source project with a more centralized governance model. Django's leadership is provided by a small group of core developers who make decisions about the direction of the project. The community contributes to the project through GitHub pull requests, but the core developers ultimately decide which changes are accepted. Django also has a Code of Conduct that sets expectations for behavior and outlines consequences for violations. In summary, while both OpenJS and Django have codes of conduct, OpenJS has a more collaborative governance model with a larger technical committee and several working groups, while Django has a more centralized governance model led by a small group of core developers.

Similarities OpenJS and Django are both popular open-source software projects that are managed and governed by their respective communities. However, there are some key differences in their governance models. In terms of similarities, both projects have a strong focus on community involvement and collaboration. They both have open development processes that allow anyone to contribute code, report issues, and participate in discussions about the future direction of the project. They also both use a similar pull request workflow for reviewing and merging code changes. Both projects also have a core team of maintainers who are responsible for overseeing the project and ensuring that it stays on track. These maintainers are typically experienced developers who have a deep understanding of the project's codebase and architecture. They are responsible for reviewing and merging code changes, managing releases, and setting the overall direction for the project.

MY OPINION After presenting the comparative study, I believe that Djamgo's governance model is superior to OpenJS's since governance model of Django allows for faster decision-making and more efficient management of the project unlike that of openJS.

[12Daisy]

cc @arliss-NF

[12Daisy]

cc @arliss-NF

[12Daisy]

cc @arliss-NF

[arliss-NF]

@12Daisy - again, this is amazing. Your analysis is very good, and the consolidation of information is well done. My only suggestion is to use bolding and bulleting to make the reading easier and to help folks who skim content find the information they are looking for. Please move forward with submitting the final application.

[12Daisy]

Okay ma’am let me complete my final application Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 3, 2023, at 4:07 PM, arliss-NF @.***> wrote: @12Daisy - again, this is amazing. Your analysis is very good, and the consolidation of information is well done. My only suggestion is to use bolding and bulleting to make the reading easier and to help folks who skim content find the information they are looking for. Please move forward with submitting the final application.

—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>