search

numixproject / numix-core

Builder for App Icon Themes
GNU General Public License v3.0
766 stars 146 forks source link

Automated Travis build stopped working #5744

Closed palob closed 2 years ago

palob commented 2 years ago

According to https://travis-ci.org/github/numixproject/numix-core migration to travis-ci.com is needed.

Foggalong commented 2 years ago

Completed the migration just now! Ran the first test build failed because fbab23fe5928a6d14c216c7e166cf969d47b720c inadvertently added the old Skype keys back (but didn't remove the new ones which is why it probably didn't get caught). Triggered a new build which passed so I think we're all good :+1:

Foggalong commented 2 years ago

As a side note though, we maaaaay need to either change how Travis builds work or find another provider long term. Under Travis' new free plan we only get 1,000 free builds before we have to start paying which given Numix no longer has an income is a no :eyes:

palob commented 2 years ago

Is it an absolute limit or time-based, like1000 per week/month/year or something?

For Numic I think a big selling point of automated builds is those per-commit builds in unmerged PRs.

If we had to change to builds on a daily/weekly schedule (ideally no builds in time without repo activity) or to manually triggered builds would this leave us with any big advantages compared to just getting the same output by running gen.py locally from time to time?

Foggalong commented 2 years ago

It's an absolute limit (needing to purchase more when used) with a bunch of weird caveat that I'd not noticed.

Screenshot from 2021-08-13 19-34-05

The TLDR is that the paid plans come with a set amount of "bonus credits" which can be used on OSS projects, but it's also possible for anyone on any plan to request a "credit allowance" for use on OSS projects on an as-needed basis. With that in mind it might be worth us leaving it as is until there's ~100 builds left and using that to work out how frequently we're getting through "credits" and then request an amount accordingly.

I agree with your latter two points too; if the "allowance" doesn't work out and we can't find a replacement service, I'd be happy to just leave it as doing the tests manually periodically.