Closed lennym closed 8 years ago
Ignore this anyway... it needs to be an INTERSECTION
or whatever the neo4j equivalent is, not a UNION
.
Back to set theory 101 for me...
Some time later... this should be ready to go now.
The tests need a wholesale refactor, but that is a separate issue I think.
LGTM
Adds a clause to the neo4j query on tile search that checks that the "active" property on the tiles is true.
I don't know if this is the best or most efficient way of doing this - I've not worked with neo4j before so this contains a fair chunk of guesswork - but based on my local tests it seems to work.
Local test as follows: