nus-cs2103-AY1819S2 / forum

CS2103/T discussion forum
6 stars 1 forks source link

Information for Week 10 #63

Open ccristina opened 5 years ago

ccristina commented 5 years ago

Dear Students, Please take note of the following:


A. Week 9 Project and Tutorial Check the website’s Project tab under weeks 10 for required submissions before the tutorial day, 23:59 (https://nus-cs2103-ay1819s2.github.io/cs2103-website/schedule/week10/). Note that you are required to:


C. FAQ:

  1. My contributions are not detected in the Reposense report, why?

    1. Check:
      1. Have you set the user.name to your GitHub user name that you provided in the premodule survey?
      2. Have you used different git user name while doing the work? Run git log command on the command line/terminal and look for the Author field.
    2. If the above are correct, you may want to provide a config file to give additional details to Reposense (check the Reposense documentation mentioned above)
      1. You need to commit the config file before running Reposense, else the config won't be picked up by the tool.
    3. Do note: if you include a config file, entries pertaining to all members of the team must be in the config file.
  2. I have done everything given in 1, but I still can't see my contributions. How to resolve?

    1. Use @@author tags to identify your code contribution in the source files.
    2. Follow the instructions given in the Reposense documentation for this
  3. I did 1 & 2, however, I cannot still see my contributions. Help!!

    1. Usually, most cases will be taken care of by 1 and 2 above.
    2. In case your contributions are still not detected, please post the issue on this forum, we will get the reposense team to take a look.
  4. How frequently is the Reposense report generated?

    1. Reposense is configured to run the report every Monday. i.e., the report is generated weekly.
  5. My friend and I worked on a piece of code together, but only my friend committed. Now how?

    1. Use @@author tags to indicate chunks of the file that is your contribution. Arrive at a consensus with your friend/teammate before claiming part of the code as yours.
  6. What is considered good contribution?

    1. Speaking from code-quality evaluation perspective, you need to have contiguous code chunks in your contribution (e.g., some full classes, some significantly long full methods).
    2. If the code is fragmented (e.g., you only added one additional field to a class, and entire code has fragmented one-two lines that work with the additional field you creates) it becomes hard to grade the code quality.

Best regards, Cristina.