Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
With all the features description and explanation being crammed in the same page the UG became too wordy and hard to follow. It's nice that there is section like Main Page, Inveestigation Case page etc, but the size of the header makes it hard for me to recognise it easily. You may want to make the differnece in header size more obvious or add different color coding for different section.
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
With all the features description and explanation being crammed in the same page the UG became too wordy and hard to follow. It's nice that there is section like Main Page, Inveestigation Case page etc, but the size of the header makes it hard for me to recognise it easily. You may want to make the differnece in header size more obvious or add different color coding for different section.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2021S1/pe-interim#1171]