Closed nowknowing closed 3 years ago
OK to omit details if not important or if the omission doesn't hinder/misleads the reader.
Note how AB3 mentions the Common
classes but doesn't go into details.
'came from AB3' is not a valid reason to omit though, as the reader doesn't know anything about AB3.
I see thank you!
In DG, we did not explain certain components. Are missing component explanations bugs? For instance, not explaining Common, which came from AB3.