Noticed a very small typo in the textbook

[kevinchua6]

I noticed notifyUIs doesn't follow the Java coding standards (below) in this section. Should probably be notifyUis instead

Sorry, I'm still in the pe mood and this has been bugging me :p

[kaixin-hc]

On the topic of minor typos, I also found some other minor typos 😅... just going to jump on this thread so as not to clutter the forum.

---

---

---

---

..

[fans2619]

I think the underline thing is intentional, not really underline, just using larger font to highlight

[damithc]

Thanks guys, keep them coming. Every bug report helps.

I think the underline thing is intentional, not really underline, just using larger font to highlight

It's bug. MarkBind recently changed the syntax it uses for underlines. The previous syntax ++text++ is now used to making the text bigger. These are places where I overlooked when migrated to the new syntax.

[fans2619]

Oh I see!

[damithc]

I noticed notifyUIs doesn't follow the Java coding standards (below) in this section. Should probably be notifyUis instead

Good catch. I think I made an exception in that case because notifyUis is harder to read than notifyUIs (due to the additional lower case s).

[damithc]

@kaixin-hc where did you find this? This was fixed sometime back in the module website.

---

Good catch. Will fix.

Good catch. Will fix.

Good catch. Will fix.

[kaixin-hc]

@kaixin-hc where did you find this? This was fixed sometime back in the module website. I took these screenshots over the course of the semester, and didn't think to check that they still worked with the website. I see that it is fixed on the module website now!

[damithc]

I took these screenshots over the course of the semester

Nice. 👍 Yes, it was fixed in the middle of the semester.

[trxe]

Adding to the thread some other small typos:

I believe there should be a space here? i.e. ". ["

[kaixin-hc]

Grammatical issues where highlighted + I feel it would be clearer to put the quote in quotation marks, rather than in italics.

[AllardQuek]

Good catch @kaixin-hc! I don't think "tasks that needs" is a grammatical error though, because it is the list of tasks that needs the user's attention.

[kaixin-hc]

Oh, I interpreted it as referring to the tasks by proximity, and I expected what needed the attention were the tasks, not the list itself. Especially as the next sentence uses a plural pronoun for what needs to be paid attention to (if the intent was to focus on the list, maybe the plural pronoun shouldn't be used in the next sentence).

[AllardQuek]

Yup, makes sense!

[damithc]

Thanks all. Will fix in the next version.