Too loose restrictions on duplicates

[nus-se-bot]

add n/AAA o/John Doe p/98765432 a/311, Clementi Ave 2 add n/AAA o/John Doe p/98765432 a/311, Clementi Ave 2, #02-25 t/Mini Beagle are considered as different pets because the addresses are in different extend of specification I personally feel like if name of the pet, name of the onwer and phone number are the same, we can safely decide that the two pets are identical It can be a serious problem if users cannot key in their addresses (or maybe the customer cannot say it the same) exactly the same each time they try to register a customer

---

_{[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S2/pe-interim#848] [original labels: severity.Medium type.FeatureFlaw]}

[soloplxya]

Team's Response

It is possible for the same owner to have two or in fact multiple addresses, from our teammates' personal experience working in a pet daycare center.

Additionally, it should not be of medium severity since it is rare for users to even key in the inputs above.

Since it is non-occasional, it should be of low severity instead.

Duplicate status (if any):

--