Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
In the above activity diagram, it is not clear where dates in the future are rejected. Is it [Date Not Passed]? If so, the wording could be better.
Note: I see that there is a similar phrasing for the meeting-related parsers. Possibly a bug where the copied PUML was not updated in this case.
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
In the above activity diagram, it is not clear where dates in the future are rejected. Is it
[Date Not Passed]
? If so, the wording could be better.Note: I see that there is a similar phrasing for the meeting-related parsers. Possibly a bug where the copied PUML was not updated in this case.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S1/pe-interim#4094] [original labels: severity.VeryLow type.DocumentationBug]