At 1:47pm, https://github.com/AY2223S2-CS2103T-W10-3/tp/pull/105 was closed -- the find command in the UG was updated to say that it performs a full text search on all fields of a contact (instead of just the name field), and the command history feature was also added to the UG. Both of these features were already present in the v1.3 JAR file.
(I'm not sure which version of the UG Tester B got -- there was no mention of this problem in Tester B's bug reports to us, so I can only assume he got the updated UG)
My questions:
can my team keep the updated full-text find feature in our tP?
can my team keep the command history feature in our tP?
I ask this as I'm not sure whether it conflicts with the idea of v1.4:
Tagging my teammates:
@niekis
@jugheadjones10
@minosx31
Tester A: @Yufannnn Tester B: @homuntan02 Tester C: @jinnieshin Tester D: @zrei
At 1:47pm, https://github.com/AY2223S2-CS2103T-W10-3/tp/pull/105 was closed -- the
find
command in the UG was updated to say that it performs a full text search on all fields of a contact (instead of just the name field), and the command history feature was also added to the UG. Both of these features were already present in the v1.3 JAR file.At 1:48pm, the GitHub pages deployment for UG was updated (https://github.com/AY2223S2-CS2103T-W10-3/tp/deployments/activity_log?environment=github-pages)
One of our peer reviewers got the updated UG (it shows the updated
find
command in the screenshot)Unfortunately, it seems like two of our peer reviewers had loaded the page before https://github.com/AY2223S2-CS2103T-W10-3/tp/pull/105 was deployed at 1:48pm, and got the "old" version of the UG
(I'm not sure which version of the UG Tester B got -- there was no mention of this problem in Tester B's bug reports to us, so I can only assume he got the updated UG)
My questions:
I ask this as I'm not sure whether it conflicts with the idea of v1.4:
Tagging my teammates: @niekis @jugheadjones10 @minosx31