Practice Paper p3.10: Is it compulsory to report doubts?

[fy17ohhh]

For practice paper part3 p3.10 the provided answer for Section A2 is not the justifications of why the option Path coverage is easier to achieve than statement coverage is incorrect. May I clarify in this case, do we needed write both justifications and the doubts of the "out-of-scope" choices?

[E0735389]

If I understood correctly:

• Looks like a formatting error. Of course in the open-ended answer field you should type in the explanation, but I suppose the instructor consider it obvious.
• Of course the doubt is written in the NOTES section of Examplify. Not compulsory, but encouraged.

[damithc]

May I clarify in this case, do we needed write both justifications and the doubts of the "out-of-scope" choices?

Encouraged to write doubts in NOTES but not compulsory. For example, if it turned out the question had two correct answers, we give marks to everyone who chose either one of them, irrespective of whether they indicated that in the NOTES.

[fy17ohhh]

I see, thank you!