Open nus-se-script opened 4 months ago
You are right regarding the NRIC digits not having appropriate validation. It has actually been taken note of during PE-D and has been added into the DG's Planned enhancements and thus considering this as NotInScope
.
--
Steps to reproduce:
add ic/S0914567D n/John Doe g/M b/10-07-2003 p/98765432 e/johnd@example.com d/Penicillin|\nCephalosporins i/Infectious Diseases i/Genetic Disorders
, which has the wrong match of NRIC and birthday.Expected:
Actual:
Screenshots:
This is problematic as this could have been a typo from the users' part. You can consider supporting this for better convenience and usability for your users. One way you can do is by throw a warning message for such mismatch.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#5073] [original labels: severity.Low type.FeatureFlaw]