Incorrect notation for UML association labels

[nus-se-script]

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

Diagram (Page 8):

Expected: The association label should use the black filled triangle that points to the class the label is referring to.

(quoted from textbook)

---

_{[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#4155] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]}

[yleeyilin]

Team's Response

While the one taught in CS2103T is the convention, there is no actual required format for these labels(https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/452286/associations-and-references-in-uml-class-diagram).

According to the TP guidelines, as long as this notation is not contradicting any of the standard notation, and hence should not be considered a bug.

Duplicate status (if any):

--