Unable to run my .jar file on another computer

[dominopizzaaaa]

Hi all, I keep getting this error when I try to run my .jar file on a few of my friends computer:

Error: JavaFX runtime components are missing, and are required to run this application.

I tried using GPT and searching online for answers, but i can't seem to solve this problem. Below is my build.gradle file, are there are issues with this file?

Thanks in advance!

plugins {
    id 'java'
    id 'application'  // Add this line for the application plugin
    id 'com.github.johnrengelman.shadow' version '7.1.2' // Shadow Plugin for Fat JAR
    id 'org.openjfx.javafxplugin' version '0.0.14'       // JavaFX Plugin
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()  // Use Maven Central for dependencies
}

dependencies {
    // Define the JavaFX version
    String javaFxVersion = '17.0.7'

    // JavaFX dependencies with platform-specific classifiers
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
}

application {
    mainClass.set("papadom.PapadomApp")
}

javafx {
    version = "17.0.7"
    modules = ['javafx.controls', 'javafx.fxml', 'javafx.graphics', 'javafx.base']
}

shadowJar {
    archiveFileName = 'papadom.jar'
    manifest {
        attributes 'Main-Class': 'papadom.PapadomApp'
    }
    mergeServiceFiles()
}

[nus-se-bot]

Tagging a few other students (randomly selected) who have completed related increments, in case they can pitch in: @BunnyHoppp @Oceankoh @LiuYJ2002 @leroytan @e1121208 @SherChew27 @Shantaa @Fluffykan @ryenl @kaikquah @yikjunxian @brianchoon @mingyang143 @Jayden-Kim-NUS @JovenSoh Others are welcome to pitch in too.

[yadobler]

you can remove

```groovy id 'org.openjfx.javafxplugin' version '0.0.14' // JavaFX Plugin ``` and ```groovy javafx { version = "17.0.7" modules = ['javafx.controls', 'javafx.fxml', 'javafx.graphics', 'javafx.base'] } ``` since they are already covered by the dependencies ----- Edit: If @RezwanAhmed123 was able to solve the problem with the plugin then do use it! -----

2. I am able to replicate this issue when I ./gradlew run on my system. The same environment is able to run my jar, so it is something with your project.

Things done (that doesn't work):

• delete and copy fresh ./gradle and ./gradlew and ./.gradle
• copied over and used my working gradle.build file to run your project

[RezwanAhmed123]

@dominopizzaaaa

I managed to recreate ur issue on my end, i think your version here is wrong:

id 'org.openjfx.javafxplugin' version '0.0.14'

I tried with the above version and got a similar error.

However, when I changed to version 0.1.0 like so:

id 'org.openjfx.javafxplugin' version '0.1.0'

the error went away.

[dominopizzaaaa]

@dominopizzaaaa

I managed to recreate ur issue on my end, i think your version here is wrong:

id 'org.openjfx.javafxplugin' version '0.0.14'

I tried with the above version and got a similar error.

However, when I changed to version 0.1.0 like so:

id 'org.openjfx.javafxplugin' version '0.1.0'

the error went away.

I tried changing the version, but i still meet the same issue on computer other than mine...

[RezwanAhmed123]

@dominopizzaaaa from what ive seen in your build.gradle you seemed to have removed dependencies for all the different OS versions.

Could you try to change your dependencies in that file to something like:

dependencies {
    testImplementation group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-api', version: '5.10.0'
    testRuntimeOnly group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-engine', version: '5.10.0'

    String javaFxVersion = '17.0.7'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
}

Furthermore you seem to have many ShadowJar methods and excess task methods than required. Maybe you can change the application, shadowJar and run methods to match the following:

application {
    mainClass.set("mortalreminder.io.Launcher")
}

shadowJar {
    archiveBaseName = "MortalReminder"
    archiveFileName = "MortalReminder.jar"
    archiveClassifier = null
}

run {
    standardInput = System.in
    enableAssertions = true
}

you can also refer to my build.gradle file for more reference.

[dominopizzaaaa]

@dominopizzaaaa from what ive seen in your build.gradle you seemed to have removed dependencies for all the different OS versions.

Could you try to change your dependencies in that file to something like:

dependencies {
    testImplementation group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-api', version: '5.10.0'
    testRuntimeOnly group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-engine', version: '5.10.0'

    String javaFxVersion = '17.0.7'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
}

Furthermore you seem to have many ShadowJar methods and excess task methods than required. Maybe you can change the application, shadowJar and run methods to match the following:

application {
    mainClass.set("mortalreminder.io.Launcher")
}

shadowJar {
    archiveBaseName = "MortalReminder"
    archiveFileName = "MortalReminder.jar"
    archiveClassifier = null
}

run {
    standardInput = System.in
    enableAssertions = true
}

you can also refer to my build.gradle file for more reference.

hm, i made my build.gradle file exactly the same as yours, but I am still facing the same issue. Is it possible that the problem is coming from a file that is not build.gradle?

[RezwanAhmed123]

Maybe you can share more about how you are creating the jar file in the first place then?

for myself, i did it exactly like this using the Command Line:

Another way to quickly see where the issue is coming from could be through the continuous integration method which is optional inside the course but I found it helpful to do a quick test to see if the app is compatible for more than my own OS. Simply follow this to try and set it up. Its not too difficult, just the addition of like one folder with one file inside your directory (make sure to remove the IO redirection parts below from the file)

      - name: Perform IO redirection test (*NIX)
        if: runner.os == 'Linux'
        working-directory:  ${{ github.workspace }}/text-ui-test
        run: ./runtest.sh

      - name: Perform IO redirection test (MacOS)
        if: always() && runner.os == 'macOS'
        working-directory:  ${{ github.workspace }}/text-ui-test
        run: ./runtest.sh

      - name: Perform IO redirection test (Windows)
        if: always() && runner.os == 'Windows'
        working-directory:  ${{ github.workspace }}/text-ui-test
        shell: cmd
        run: runtest.bat

It tries to build your app in github using 3 different OS version (Ubuntu, MacOS and windows), then if there is an error you can read thru what is going on inside github like this:

except if there is an error (not a warning like above), they will signal in red and stop the build.

[Incogdino]

Hi I tried cloning your master branch repo(hopefully that is the branch you are working on) and made several changes to some of the files. I'm not sure if this would solve the issue for you but it did on my end.

First I just copied most of my own build.gradle file and applied to yours

plugins {
    id 'java'
    id 'application'
    id 'com.github.johnrengelman.shadow' version '7.1.2'
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    testImplementation group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-api', version: '5.10.0'
    testImplementation 'org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter:5.8.1'
    testImplementation 'org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter:5.8.1'
    testRuntimeOnly group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-engine', version: '5.10.0'

    String javaFxVersion = '17.0.7'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
}

test {
    useJUnitPlatform()

    testLogging {
        events "passed", "skipped", "failed"

        showExceptions true
        exceptionFormat "full"
        showCauses true
        showStackTraces true
        showStandardStreams = false
    }
}

application {
    mainClass.set("papadom.Launcher")
}

shadowJar {
    archiveBaseName = "papadom"
    archiveClassifier = null
}

run{
    standardInput = System.in
}

[!Note] I removed the checkstyle options in the build.gradle file for ease of testing. You would probably want to add them back for grading purposes.

I then added a Launcher class at the same level as papadom directory

package papadom;

import javafx.application.Application;

public class Launcher {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Application.launch(PapadomApp.class, args);
    }
}

I also removed the main method from the PapadomApp file

package papadom;

import javafx.application.Application;
import javafx.fxml.FXMLLoader;
import javafx.scene.Scene;
import javafx.stage.Stage;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;

public class PapadomApp extends Application {
    public static final int WINDOW_WIDTH = 600;
    public static final int WINDOW_HEIGHT = 400;

    @Override
    public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
        try {
            // Load the FXML file that describes the UI layout
            FXMLLoader fxmlLoader = new FXMLLoader(getClass().getResource("/fxml/MainView.fxml"));

            // Create a scene using the loaded FXML, setting the window size (600x400)
            Scene scene = new Scene(fxmlLoader.load(), WINDOW_WIDTH, WINDOW_HEIGHT);

            // Set the title of the window
            primaryStage.setTitle("Papadom Chatbot");

            // Set the scene (i.e., the window content) and display the window
            primaryStage.setScene(scene);
            primaryStage.show();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            Logger.getLogger(PapadomApp.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, "Failed to load FXML", e);
        }
    }

    // The main method launches the JavaFX application
}

This is how the directory looks

[dominopizzaaaa]

Hi I tried cloning your master branch repo(hopefully that is the branch you are working on) and made several changes to some of the files. I'm not sure if this would solve the issue for you but it did on my end.

First I just copied most of my own build.gradle file and applied to yours

plugins {
    id 'java'
    id 'application'
    id 'com.github.johnrengelman.shadow' version '7.1.2'
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    testImplementation group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-api', version: '5.10.0'
    testImplementation 'org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter:5.8.1'
    testImplementation 'org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter:5.8.1'
    testRuntimeOnly group: 'org.junit.jupiter', name: 'junit-jupiter-engine', version: '5.10.0'

    String javaFxVersion = '17.0.7'

    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac'
    implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'
}

test {
    useJUnitPlatform()

    testLogging {
        events "passed", "skipped", "failed"

        showExceptions true
        exceptionFormat "full"
        showCauses true
        showStackTraces true
        showStandardStreams = false
    }
}

application {
    mainClass.set("papadom.Launcher")
}

shadowJar {
    archiveBaseName = "papadom"
    archiveClassifier = null
}

run{
    standardInput = System.in
}

Note

I removed the checkstyle options in the build.gradle file for ease of testing. You would probably want to add them back for grading purposes.

I then added a Launcher class at the same level as papadom directory

package papadom;

import javafx.application.Application;

public class Launcher {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Application.launch(PapadomApp.class, args);
    }
}

I also removed the main method from the PapadomApp file

package papadom;

import javafx.application.Application;
import javafx.fxml.FXMLLoader;
import javafx.scene.Scene;
import javafx.stage.Stage;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;

public class PapadomApp extends Application {
    public static final int WINDOW_WIDTH = 600;
    public static final int WINDOW_HEIGHT = 400;

    @Override
    public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
        try {
            // Load the FXML file that describes the UI layout
            FXMLLoader fxmlLoader = new FXMLLoader(getClass().getResource("/fxml/MainView.fxml"));

            // Create a scene using the loaded FXML, setting the window size (600x400)
            Scene scene = new Scene(fxmlLoader.load(), WINDOW_WIDTH, WINDOW_HEIGHT);

            // Set the title of the window
            primaryStage.setTitle("Papadom Chatbot");

            // Set the scene (i.e., the window content) and display the window
            primaryStage.setScene(scene);
            primaryStage.show();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            Logger.getLogger(PapadomApp.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, "Failed to load FXML", e);
        }
    }

    // The main method launches the JavaFX application
}

This is how the directory looks

this works! thanks a lot! however, i tried it on different machines and it did not work on a Apple Silicon (ARM64) processor machine. does this matter? i understand the cs2103t website only gave us this:

implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-base', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-controls', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-fxml', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'win' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'mac' implementation group: 'org.openjfx', name: 'javafx-graphics', version: javaFxVersion, classifier: 'linux'

[damithc]

i tried it on different machines and it did not work on a Apple Silicon (ARM64) processor machine. does this matter?

@dominopizzaaaa Was that machine using the exact JDK distribution we prescribed? If not, that could be the reason why it didn't work. Perhaps you can share that jar file here so that others can test it on their Mac machines?

[dominopizzaaaa]

i tried it on different machines and it did not work on a Apple Silicon (ARM64) processor machine. does this matter?

@dominopizzaaaa Was that machine using the exact JDK distribution we prescribed? If not, that could be the reason why it didn't work. Perhaps you can share that jar file here so that others can test it on their Mac machines?

yes, it was using that JDK. I have released my JAR file, @ others do help me test on your mac machines!

my jar file

[damithc]

yes, it was using that JDK. I have released my JAR file, @ others do help me test on your mac machines!

my jar file

Apple Silicon Mac users, are you able to run the above jar file? First, run the java -version command to ensure you are using the Azul SDK we have prescribed, and then use the java -jar command to run the jar file in the same terminal.

[itstrueitstrueitsrealitsreal]

Hi @dominopizzaaaa, I'm a senior from a previous batch dropping in to help.

My OS details:
OS: macOS Sonoma 14.2.1 arm64
Host: MacBook Pro (14-inch, 2021)
JDK version: openjdk 17.0.11 2024-04-16 LTS
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)

i tried it on different machines and it did not work on a Apple Silicon (ARM64) processor machine. does this matter?

@dominopizzaaaa Was that machine using the exact JDK distribution we prescribed? If not, that could be the reason why it didn't work. Perhaps you can share that jar file here so that others can test it on their Mac machines?

yes, it was using that JDK. I have released my JAR file, @ others do help me test on your mac machines!

my jar file

It seems to be working on my machine using java -jar papadom.jar , I also managed to clone it and build it locally using a silicon (ARM64) Mac.

To narrow down the issue, on which OS-es did you encounter the problem on?

[zhonghan721]

Hi @dominopizzaaaa, I am from your senior batch. I am able to run your JAR file using java - jar command on my Apple Silicon Mac machine.

My OS details:

OS: macOS Sonoma 14.6.1 arm64
Host: MacBook Air (13-inch, 2022)
JDK version: openjdk version "17.0.11" 2024-04-16 LTS
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)

[MadLamprey]

Hello @dominopizzaaaa! I am from your senior batch. I am also able to run your JAR file on my Apple Silicon Machine. OS Details:

• OS: macOS Sonoma 14.6.1
• JDK version: openjdk version "17.0.11" 2024-04-16 LTS
• OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS)
• OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)

I also cloned your master branch to test it out locally and I was able to run the app successfully without the refactoring for the Launcher class.

[dominopizzaaaa]

Hello @dominopizzaaaa! I am from your senior batch. I am also able to run your JAR file on my Apple Silicon Machine. OS Details:

• OS: macOS Sonoma 14.6.1
• JDK version: openjdk version "17.0.11" 2024-04-16 LTS
• OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS)
• OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)

I also cloned your master branch to test it out locally and I was able to run the app successfully without the refactoring for the Launcher class.

thanks a lot for your help!

[dominopizzaaaa]

Hi @dominopizzaaaa, I'm a senior from a previous batch dropping in to help.

My OS details:
OS: macOS Sonoma 14.2.1 arm64
Host: MacBook Pro (14-inch, 2021)
JDK version: openjdk 17.0.11 2024-04-16 LTS
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)

i tried it on different machines and it did not work on a Apple Silicon (ARM64) processor machine. does this matter?

@dominopizzaaaa Was that machine using the exact JDK distribution we prescribed? If not, that could be the reason why it didn't work. Perhaps you can share that jar file here so that others can test it on their Mac machines?

yes, it was using that JDK. I have released my JAR file, @ others do help me test on your mac machines! my jar file

It seems to be working on my machine using java -jar papadom.jar , I also managed to clone it and build it locally using a silicon (ARM64) Mac.

To narrow down the issue, on which OS-es did you encounter the problem on?

thank you! i had issues running it on a Apple-silicon mac machine

[dominopizzaaaa]

Hi @dominopizzaaaa, I am from your senior batch. I am able to run your JAR file using java - jar command on my Apple Silicon Mac machine.

My OS details:

OS: macOS Sonoma 14.6.1 arm64
Host: MacBook Air (13-inch, 2022)
JDK version: openjdk version "17.0.11" 2024-04-16 LTS
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu17.50+19-CA (build 17.0.11+9-LTS, mixed mode, sharing)

thanks all for the help!