Open nus-pe-bot opened 18 hours ago
Reading through your DG
UML Diagram for Logic Component seems to consist of some incorrect notation. I believe Dependency Lines should not have labels. Notation <<>> is incorrect as well.
<<>>
Updating your diagram and remove the dependency lines
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2425S1/pe-interim#347] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]
Using the tags << >> in dependency arrows is a valid UML notation. This notation was also used in AB3's documentation.
<< >>
The tag in the dependency arrow is used to describe the type of dependency.
Screenshot from IBM
--
Background
Reading through your DG
Encountered Behaviour
UML Diagram for Logic Component seems to consist of some incorrect notation. I believe Dependency Lines should not have labels. Notation
<<>>
is incorrect as well.Suggestion
Updating your diagram and remove the dependency lines
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2425S1/pe-interim#347] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]