The above input has a valid phone number 99999999 as specified in the UG and app as seen in the error message below. The error in this input is the addition of 0/ but the error message claims it is the phone number which is not the case as explained previously.
It would be good to change the validation/parsing to correctly pinpoint 0/ as the error and not the phone number so the user is not confused what caused the command to not work.
There is no '0/' as part of our current prefixes. Hence, the p/ sees the input as "99999999 0/", therefore the application gives the error message which is correct message.
Input: edit 2 t/ p/99999999 0/
The above input has a valid phone number 99999999 as specified in the UG and app as seen in the error message below. The error in this input is the addition of 0/ but the error message claims it is the phone number which is not the case as explained previously.
It would be good to change the validation/parsing to correctly pinpoint 0/ as the error and not the phone number so the user is not confused what caused the command to not work.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2425S1/pe-interim#790] [original labels: type.FeatureFlaw severity.Low]