Related to #3, even a fresh restart and typing word for word of the example in UG, gives me an error

[nus-se-bot]

Word for word. Add command is utterly broken..? Seems like someone added a new feature and didn't update the UG that the add function needs a new birthday field.

---

_{[original: nus-tic4002-AY2122s2/pe-interim#150] [original labels: type.FunctionalityBug severity.High]}

[l-shihao]

Team's Response

Would accept as a DocumentationBug, that this our add command format, it states b/BIRTHDAY without [], meaning NOT optional; but we did miss out this part in the example we gave in UG.

Duplicate status (if any):

--