tl;dr Are there any objections to using RFC 2119 style for the Style Guide (e.g., "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", etc.)?
The Style Guide currently a somewhat "awkward" (IMHO) phrasing for most recommendations. E.g.:
It's recommended to put one space after : after record key.
That could be more naturally expressed with:
It is recommended that you put one space after : after record key.
or, better:
A single space after the : following a record key IS RECOMMENDED.
But most readable and natural is the RFC 2119 style:
The : after a record key name SHOULD be followed by a space.
I know (because I share it) that there's often resistance to using RFC 2119 wording, and it's often not needed. However, I think that it makes this particular document much more readable.
tl;dr Are there any objections to using RFC 2119 style for the Style Guide (e.g., "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", etc.)?
The Style Guide currently a somewhat "awkward" (IMHO) phrasing for most recommendations. E.g.:
That could be more naturally expressed with:
or, better:
But most readable and natural is the RFC 2119 style:
I know (because I share it) that there's often resistance to using RFC 2119 wording, and it's often not needed. However, I think that it makes this particular document much more readable.