Update checkPrerequisite to match wildcard prerequisites

[ChillinRage]

Change checking to parse for wildcards and check for matching prefixes instead of exact string matches.

Context

Proposal to fix #3733 where prerequisite wildcards returns zero matches.

Implementation

Changed the checkPrerequisite function in planner.ts to check if any module in the set has a prefix that matches the string before the wildcard symbol (i.e. UTC in UTC%).

The implementation is still the same as before for non-wildcard modules.

Other Information

• package.json was updated as the previous version raised an error regarding outdated jest environ version when running yarn test.
• Updated planner.test.ts file to handle tests for wildcard modules.
• This is my first time committing to nusmods :)

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
nusmods-export	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jul 3, 2024 4:34pm
nusmods-website	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jul 3, 2024 4:34pm

[vercel[bot]]

@ChillinRage is attempting to deploy a commit to the modsbot's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.62%. Comparing base (1d4ec40) to head (969dcbe).

Files	Patch %	Lines
website/src/utils/planner.ts	91.66%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #3737 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 53.53% 53.62% +0.09% ========================================== Files 274 274 Lines 6017 6025 +8 Branches 1443 1446 +3 ========================================== + Hits 3221 3231 +10 + Misses 2796 2794 -2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ChillinRage]

Hi sorry for the late response. I have fixed the linter errors and warnings already. One question I have is why are iterative functions (like forEach, filter etc.) preferred over for loops?

[ravern]

Thank you for your fixes! And no need to apologise on response time, there's no rush on fixes/features :)

One question I have is why are iterative functions (like forEach, filter etc.) preferred over for loops?

Unfortunately I don't have a good reason for you, since this is just part of the linting configuration we're using — we didn't explicitly opt-in to avoiding for of loops.

There's some discussion at https://github.com/airbnb/javascript/issues/1271 about why this rule exists, but I personally don't think there's a lot of productive discussion and it's really more of an opinion.

I would advise to just follow the linting configuration for now, unless it is obviously wrong/broken, in which case you can raise it up in your PR description for your reviewers.

[ravern]

You'll see your change in https://latest.nusmods.com, and we'll update once it's on https://nusmods.com (when we merge to production branch). Congrats on your first contribution @ChillinRage!