Closed xiemeilong closed 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing the result! @xiemeilong
The normal you've estimated seems fine. We don't explicitly tackle texture in our paper, if you want higher-quality texture, you can try increasing mise_iter
(e.g. to 2) during mesh extraction.
Also, I guess our training data doesn't contain construction sites, and you can try to fine-tune the model if you have data containing tubes/scaffolds.
Happy to discuss more if you are concerned with any specific issues in your reconstruction.
@xiemeilong Could you upload a copy of your point cloud with normals and colors (ideally in PLY)?
@heiwang1997 Due to an error in executing "vis.show_3d" on my computer, I saved the model using "vis.to_file" and rendered it in Blender instead. Since there were no textures, the rendering was done using vertex colors.
@fwilliams I'm sorry, the point cloud belongs to the company and it is a power facility, so it is not suitable for be public .
I see. We really hope to further improve NKSR in the future with the feedback from the community, but just saying 'less than ideal' is a bit vague for us to make active changes. Would you please kindly point us to some possible suggestions for improvement?
Closing due to inactivity. Feel free to re-open if you still have a problem.
The results of my test seem to be less than ideal. The normals in my point cloud were generated in CloudCompare, and I'm not sure if that's the reason. point cloud generated normals