Open josephsl opened 4 months ago
@josephsl IMO, in the following cases, the UG text should be preferred over the UI text:
Audio output device: the category is audio. Including the word is redundant.
Browse mode: maximum lines per page is more accurate.
Browse mode: Trap non-command gestures from reaching the document. "All" is just unnecessary verbosity here.
Document formatting: Report formatting changes after the cursor. The part about the lag is of dubious truth on even remotely modern systems. Do we have any statistics demonstrating this supposed lag? I have not ever observed it when testing this feature, across all kinds of hardware, in at least eight years. If it is as questionable as I think, better to touch on it in the guide, and leave it out of the UI and option title.
Advanced: Debug logging categories. Are those categories logged when not in debug loglevel? Do they serve any purpose other than for debugging?
Agree with @XLTechie's remarks.
In addition, I'd say that "Sound split mode" could just be "Sound split". IMO "there is no need to speak about modes of everything. Thus "Modes available in the 'Cycle sound split mode' command" could just become "Values available in the 'Cycle sound split mode' command". On the opposite for example, "Speech mode" cannot just become "Speech" for example. Cc @mltony for opinion if you wish.
The same way, "Audio ducking mode" could just become "Audio ducking", with the appropriate values listed in the combo box.
At last, while at it, should we double check the consistency of all options regarding the final colon (:)?
@Qchristensen
Hi,
Stems from #5201:
Detailed description of the issue
Suppose a trainer is demonstrating NVDA settings while consulting the user guide. While looking at settings interface, the trainer does not find the option in the user guide but locates the description for a similar sounding option. For example, in general settings panel, the option to change NVDA's user interface language is labeled "NVDA language" whereas the user guide calls it "Language".
Why are the other templates not appropriate in this case?
This issue is about inconsistencies between the user interface and the user guide. This cannot be classified as a bug as it might be an oversight. This is not a feature request in a strict sense of the template as this issue is asking for consistent documentation.
Have you asked for advice on how to report this issue via a community discussion? If so, please link to the discussion
None (see #5201 as justification).
Steps to reproduce or illustrate the issue (if applicable)
Expected outcome or behaviour (if applicable)
Option label should be consistent between the user interface (general settings panel) and documentation (user guide).
Screenshots, logs, and other attachments (if applicable)
None
System configuration or software environment (if applicable)
Windows 11 24H2 preview (build 26100.1150)
Additional information (if applicable)
Used as NVDA development workstation (local source code available)
Inconsistencies between the user interface and the user guide
The ones with parentheses might not be up for editing (if the proposal is accepted) as text in brackets serve to highlight the effect of changing settings.
Discussion points:
Thanks.