search

nvaldivi / ogms

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/ogms
0 stars 0 forks source link

Disjoint subtypes in ogms.owl #46

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The children of bodily feature of a patient (manifestation of a disease,
sign, symptom, phenotype) should not be disjoint OWL classes in ogms.owl.

Alan, in converting from OBO to OWL is there a way to relax the assumption
that all subtypes are disjoint?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by albertgo...@gmail.com on 18 Jan 2010 at 2:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
There are currently no statements of disjoint classes in the OWL. In OBI we 
generate disjoints based on some 
rules (implemented as lisp code). Going forward for OGMS we should consider how 
we want to either choose to 
explicitly assert disjoints, or leave some sort of annotation that the script 
can pick up and use to generate 
disjoints where appropriate.

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 18 Jan 2010 at 5:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by albertgo...@gmail.com on 18 Jan 2010 at 7:13