if we look at the subtypes of disease course in OGMS:
acute d. c.
chronic d. c.
progressive d.c.
transient d.c.
None of that has a necessary and sufficient restriction.
I presume that there is a subclass of acute d.c. that is acute flu course.
How do we know that it is not the following:
disease course is superclass to flu disease course is superclass to acute flu
disease course
instead of
disease course is superclass to acute disease course is superclass to flu acute
disease course?
This might give rise to some ambiguity and it seems to be contra-intuitively
from an ontological point of view.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by MBrochhausen@gmail.com on 12 Dec 2010 at 11:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
MBrochhausen@gmail.com
on 12 Dec 2010 at 11:49