Full name of highlight group not displayed by TSHighlightCaptureUnderCursor

[anthony-S93]

This is a bit similar to #70, but I still can't get the full name of the highlight group to show with TSHighlightCaptureUnderCursor as shown in the README.

Here is mine:

For some reason, the full name of the highlight group wasn't displayed. I'm obviously missing something here.

My configs:

        use
    {
        "nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter",
        run = ':TSUpdate',
        config = function()
        require("nvim-treesitter.configs").setup{
            highlight = {
                enable = true,
                additional_vim_regex_highlighting = true,
            },
            ensure_installed = {"c", "cpp", "java", "python", "lua"},
        }
        end,
    }

    use
    {
        "nvim-treesitter/playground",
        config = function()
        playgrond = {
            enable = true,
            disable = {},
            updatetime = 25,
            persist_queries = false,
            keybindings = {
                toggle_query_editor = 'o',
                toggle_hl_groupd = 'i',
                toggle_injected_languages = 't',
                toggle_anonymous_nodes = 'a',
                toggle_language_display = 'I',
                focus_language = 'f',
                unfocus_language = 'F',
                update = 'R',
                goto_node = '<cr>',
                show_help = '?',
            },
        }
        end,
        --after = {"nvim-treesitter"}
    }

[clason]

Those are the full names of the highlight groups after a recent change to Neovim. The function has to be adapted to again show the linked highlight groups (if any).

[gsheru]

Same here.

Capture group is shown but linked higroups do not.

[clason]

Capture group is highlight group for 0.8.

[gsheru]

Capture group is highlight group for 0.8.

With the @ and the dots? Like in @function.builtin? And we loose the syntax prefix? Like in vimTSConstant?

There is any documentation about that change? To be prepared. And to learn the reason and benefits behind than change. That'll be a huge pain in the bumbum for a lot of colorschemes, I think. But... 🤷

[clason]

With the @ and the dots? Like in @function.builtin?

Yes.

There is any documentation about that change? To be prepared. And to learn the reason and benefits behind than change.

https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/14090#issuecomment-1228444035

A reminder that (all of!) treesitter integration is still declared experimental and subject to big changes as we work out the best way of doing things. (Case in point: this change makes setting up color schemes much more straightforward.)

[clason]

Closing this as basically "won't fix", since the capture name (plus implicit .language) now replaces the chain of highlight links.

Showing custom links was never part of this functionality but is already tracked as a new feature request in #70.