Closed ColinKennedy closed 9 months ago
That's an interesting concern. @benlubas @Frederick888 thoughts?
I'm completely fine with adding some sort of OSS license, but I am unsure which one would be preferred.
Typically I use MIT simply because I'm not usually doing anything life changing or ground breaking lol and I wouldn't consider hydra any of those things either. I don't believe the original version we're forked from has a license either so technically hydra is unlicensed.
Oh wow. I kinda just assumed the plugin we forked had an oss licence lol.
MIT sounds good to me
I have set the License for this project to MIT, though do understand that if the overarching org (nvimtools) decides it should be something else, we may have to reconsider. I don't foresee that happening but did want to call it out.
MIT sounds good to me too :)
(And I didn't realise there was no licence when I contributed to the original repo either lol)
Hi, I love and use this plug-in every day for git and DAP debugging! My workplace is cautious about allowing code without a
LICENSE
file and it'd be a big help if this plug-in could use a FOSS license. I'm sure others in the same position and would appreciate it too. Could a FOSS license please be added if this plug-in is meant for public use?