Closed ClaudiaAOML closed 2 months ago
Hi @ClaudiaAOML, thanks for opening this ticket, and thanks @tcarval for adding the term on the NVS.
It is just being reviewed before publishing, and we had a couple of questions: it may be useful to confirm whether it's designed by SIO and manufactured by MRV, or designed and manufactured by SIO as the NVS submission suggests? (if the former, and MRV is in fact the manufacturer of other SOLO floats, some other descriptions in R23 might need reviewing).
Also, and this is only minor, but would it be useful for the name be closer to its original name, if its original name is the following: https://www.mrvsys.com/products/s2-bgc - e.g. BGC_SOLO_II or SOLO_II_BGC? Just a suggestion - SOLO_BGC works just as well.
Thanks, Violetta
Edit: apologies, I've just seen https://github.com/nvs-vocabs/ArgoVocabs/issues/85. We'll commit SOLO_BGC on the NVS as requested!
This ticket is a duplicate of https://github.com/nvs-vocabs/ArgoVocabs/issues/85
we are getting this from the format checker: PLATFORM_TYPE/PLATFORM_MAKER: Inconsistent: 'SOLO_BGC'/'MRV'
SOLO_BGC can have the manufacturer MRV or SIO. I wish I had know what would happen for this float (2903886_meta.nc) earlier ...
SOLO_BGC_MRV is available in R08. However, it is not listed in R23. This is the source of the issue. To be consistent with other SOLO family floats there should be a SOLO_BGC_MRV listed in R23.
SOLO_BGC_MRV : MRV : 886 (other?) : PLATFORM_TYPE_KEY?
Hello Claudia and John, I added SOLO_BGC_MRV in R23 SOLO_BGC_MRV | 207 | 886 887 | MRV | MRV SOLO |
Hello Claudia and John, I added SOLO_BGC_MRV in R23 SOLO_BGC_MRV | 207 | 886 887 | MRV | MRV SOLO |
The PLATFORM_TYPE_KEY is 207
I removed 886 and 887 WMO codr from SOLO_BGC entry
The new release of the format checker is released: https://github.com/euroargodev/ArgoNetCDF/releases/tag/v2.8.11 Active on Coriolis GDAC, US-GDAC informed
SOLO_BGC as instrument type gets rejected by the GDACs. Because of that we have to send them as SOLO_II floats.