Open neilriley-NOAA opened 3 years ago
@melinashak-noaa is there anything left on this ticket that needs to be implemented or do we just need to test each scenario?
otherwise believe everything else should be implemented
@sethgerou-noaa We need to revisit this ticket as it pertains to IFQ species grouping calculations. I don't think these calcs have been completed. Example is tripId 100321 in Prod. This trip has a use case where there is a catch grouping UNST. No discard was calculated for the UNST discard.
@sethgerou-noaa @melinashak-noaa I am going to move this up the priority list. Another example to reference for unsorted logbook catch is trip 100327 in prod.
@sethgerou-noaa @melinashak-noaa @BHHorness-NOAA
We need to make sure any catch grouping codes are included in calculations in Appendix C of the "IFQ Accounting: Business Rules for sending EM and Logbook Data to NMFS" document. I have included the language from the doc below and species codes. There are some specific rules listed that allow for weights to be dropped if < 50 lbs/trip. I don't want this to get overlooked.
Specific Business Rules: • Rules apply to discards in the EM Bottom Trawl and Fixed Gear fleets. • Rules apply to discards that are identified to a group level (thornyheads, flatfish, rockfish, roundfish) rather than a specific IFQ category. • Discards identified to a group level are divided up and assigned to an IFQ category based on the logbook reported ratio of all species (IFQ and non-IFQ) from that group. If the logbook reports non-IFQ species from the group, that same proportion would be dropped from the EM estimate. For example, if EM has 10 lbs of unidentified flatfish and the logbook reports 5 lbs of Dover sole and 5 lbs of deepsea sole, the final EM estimate would be 5 lbs of Dover sole and the remaining 5 lbs would be dropped from debiting. • The logbook ratio is calculated preferentially in the following order: