Closed neilriley-NOAA closed 3 years ago
@sethgerou-noaa. this change looks fine. correct me if I am wrong but we would not be able to identify the person (3rd party staff person) that submitted the data? Wondering if we need to add review name?
We expect reviewerName in submissions - we also store the boatnet username of the boatnet account that submitted the data to the api. https://github.com/nwfsc-fram/boatnet-module/blob/master/bn-models/src/models/trips-api/catches.ts
I'd think reviewerName would be the more reliable means of determining who submitted the data as a 3rd party provider could elect to use a single boatnet account to link all their software to the tripsApi.
This is another case where it would be useful to have a listing of required logbook fields and required review fields.
Agreed. I am working on a listing of required logbook fields and required review fields today.
@sethgerou-noaa the "provider" field is missing from the logbook json example in the app.