Closed Netzarim closed 9 years ago
Unfortunately I'm not seeing anything like this on any of the systems I run and develop on. I'll keep an eye out though.
Your best bet is to download the free version of Visual Studio or MonoDevelop or Xamarin Studio and compile MultiMiner and see if your problem persists. If so try checkout out an older commit from Git and try again. Let me know once you've found the commit that causes the problem for you.
See the following for more info: http://contribute.multiminerapp.com
Nate Woolls notifications@github.com wrote ..
Your best bet is to download the free version of Visual Studio or MonoDevelop or Xamarin Studio and compile MultiMiner and see if your problem persists. If so try checkout out an older commit from Git and try again. Let me know once you've found the commit that causes the problem for you.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/nwoolls/MultiMiner/issues/189#issuecomment-68456703
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam. http://mailgw.ihms.net/cgi-bin/learn-spam.cgi?id=0C9DB795BA.A6066 Click here to report this message as ham (not spam). http://mailgw.ihms.net/cgi-bin/learn-ham.cgi?id=0C9DB795BA.A6066
I just used Sysinternals process explorer on it. The trouble is in mscorwks.dll!InitializeFusion+0x3410. This thread is where all the memory is being used along with about 20% CPU. Both Systems are Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit. Since this appears to be part of .NET, I updated my .NET to 4.5.2, but still have the same problem.
Now, the AMD system has about 27 devices on it, but the i7 system only has 1, an Antminer USB. But I don't think that is the problem.
I've installed 3.8.1 and I am not seeing the issue. I then installed 3.8.2, and not seeing the issue. I then installed 3.8.3, and the problem returned. I am going to back off my installs to 3.8.2 for now. I am installing Visual Studio and will attempt local compile as well..
Eric
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
Thanks - looking forward to the details. Unfortunately I'm not seeing the issues here. I've run through several profilers and samplers and not seeing anything regarding memory or resource leaks yet.
What is the output of ipconfig on your system?
Version 3.8.3 more accurately scans network devices on your system, which may mean it is scanning a much larger range that previously. However, this should not cause memory or resource leaks in theory.
As an example, I have an adapter in my VM with the following information which causes MultiMiner to portscan 65k IP addresses:
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 169.254.80.80 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
If you have an adapter with a subnet mask such as 255.0.0.0 or 0.0.0.0 MultiMiner may be scanning a much larger range, and then starting the scan again (every 15 minutes) before completing the previous scan.
At home I am 192.168.0.x/24. at work I am on a 10.7.27.0/24, so they are all class C subnets - not large...
At home I have 4 network attached devices 3x Antminer S1m and 1x Antminer S3, none at work...
Eric
Nate Woolls notifications@github.com wrote ..
What is the output of ipconfig on your system?
Version 3.8.3 more accurately scans network devices on your system, which may mean it is scanning a much larger range that previously. However, this should not cause memory or resource leaks in theory.
As an example, I have an adapter in my VM with the following information which causes MultiMiner to portscan 19k IP addresses:
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 169.254.80.80 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
If you have an adapter with a subnet mask such as 255.0.0.0 or 0.0.0.0 MultiMiner may be scanning a much larger range, and then starting the scan again (every 15 minutes) before completing the previous scan.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/nwoolls/MultiMiner/issues/189#issuecomment-68470405
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam. http://mailgw.ihms.net/cgi-bin/learn-spam.cgi?id=9FA33795BA.A47BD Click here to report this message as ham (not spam). http://mailgw.ihms.net/cgi-bin/learn-ham.cgi?id=9FA33795BA.A47BD
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
You could test this pretty easily by disabling Network Device detection temporarily and seeing if it affects the growing memory use on your systems:
https://github.com/nwoolls/MultiMiner/wiki/Settings#advanced-application-settings
Nate Woolls notifications@github.com wrote ..
You could test this pretty easily by disabling Network Device detection temporarily and seeing if it affects the growing memory use on your systems:
https://github.com/nwoolls/MultiMiner/wiki/Settings#advanced-application-settings
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/nwoolls/MultiMiner/issues/189#issuecomment-68471056
This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean. Click here to report this message as spam. http://mailgw.ihms.net/cgi-bin/learn-spam.cgi?id=5FF0E795BA.A2D28 Click here to report this message as ham (not spam). http://mailgw.ihms.net/cgi-bin/learn-ham.cgi?id=5FF0E795BA.A2D28
That seems to have cured the memory issue... I turned them off and on a couple times and restarted each time. The memory goes crazy with it on.. Did not do that in 3.8.2.
Thanks,
Eric
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
Can you please post the output of ipconfig on both systems. Sounds like you have adapters on class B or A subnets.
Fixed in 359480f089173664f79d94874f0a9683bdc80961
Working great. Thanks.
I've updated to 3.8.3.340 on two machines this morning. One is using an AMD proc, the other is Intel. On both machines memory utilization fro MultiMiner.Win.exe is spiraling out of control. It is causing the systems to be unusable and freezing. I have the Intel one with me, it is an i7, and currently memory is at 7G on this process... When I left home this morning, the system for the AMD was all but hung with over 4G memory and increasing..
The update was done through the application, not as a download and re-install... I just pulled the latest, and re-installed and still seeing the same problem...