Closed Hadatko closed 1 year ago
Good point. Unfortunately, we already passed the feature freeze date so I can prepare the update but not be used in coming v4.0.0
No problem. Personally i don't need it. I saw NXP example where it make sense likely (app_srtm related). But generally it make sense to let user define timeout. If you would do it into this release you don't have to solve backward compatibility. I am just sharing this idea ;)
Yes, agree but the date is gone, unfortunately. Anyway, will provide this in the further release. Thanks for this idea.
I am suggesting to extend rpmsg_lite_wait_for_link_up with one parameter uint32_t timeoutMs and return value -> true/false So user can insert max time to wait in ms and return true/false based on link is up or not.