Closed shimkiv closed 4 months ago
Maybe Smart contract
should be part of the zkApp
section (like Alias
and Account
for Fee payer
)?
Maybe
Smart contract
should be part of thezkApp
section (likeAlias
andAccount
forFee payer
)?
Like this:
โฑ๏ธ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 3, because the PR involves changes in multiple files with modifications to both logic and string formatting. The changes are not overly complex but require a careful review to ensure that the modifications in string outputs and conditions do not introduce any logical errors or regressions. |
๐งช Relevant tests | No |
๐ Possible issues | URL Formatting Issue: The modification in `src/lib/config.js` changes how the URL is constructed. The use of `&?` might be incorrect and should be `&`. This could lead to malformed URLs. |
๐ Security concerns | No |
relevant file | src/lib/config.js |
suggestion | Consider correcting the URL parameter separator from `&?` to `&` to avoid potential issues with URL parsing. This change ensures that the URL is correctly formatted and functional. [important] |
relevant line | (explorerName ? `&?explorer=${explorerName}` : '') + |
relevant file | src/lib/deploy.js |
suggestion | It's recommended to handle the scenario where `transactionJson` or `transaction` might be undefined or null before using them. This can prevent runtime errors in cases where the transaction fails to initialize properly. [important] |
relevant line | let transactionJson = transaction.json; |
relevant file | src/lib/deploy.js |
suggestion | Consider adding error handling for the `process.exit(1);` call to provide a cleaner exit strategy, such as logging the error or cleaning up resources before exiting. This improves the robustness of the deployment script. [medium] |
relevant line | process.exit(1); |
relevant file | src/lib/deploy.js |
suggestion | To enhance readability and maintainability, consider refactoring the large block of changes into smaller, more focused functions. This can help in isolating functionality and making the code easier to understand and test. [medium] |
relevant line | chalk.bold('Transaction fee'), chalk.reset(`${Number(fee) / 1e9} Mina`)], |
PR Review
Thanks @MartinMinkov and CodiumAI PR-Agent
:D
PR Review Thanks @MartinMinkov and CodiumAI PR-Agent :D
I wanted to try out this tool :laughing: Not sure if it's that helpful, thanks for your patience @shimkiv !
I wanted to try out this tool ๐ Not sure if it's that helpful, thanks for your patience @shimkiv !
This is cool @Martin!
Maybe
Smart contract
should be part of thezkApp
section (likeAlias
andAccount
forFee payer
)?Like this:
![]()
I like this @shimkiv .
Are we ok to merge this for now and continue improvements as part of https://github.com/o1-labs/zkapp-cli/issues/633? cc @ymekuria @MartinMinkov
Are we ok to merge this for now and continue improvements as part of #633? cc @ymekuria @MartinMinkov
@shimkiv This is good to merge as far as I'm concerned.
Closes #630