Drop usage of ipaddr filters and remove dependency on python-netaddr

[michalskrivanek]

not sure if it fixes #695 but it's a good thing in any case...

[michalskrivanek]

/ost he-basic-suite-master

[michalskrivanek]

seems to work ok, it now broke on the next dependency, jmespath.

[michalskrivanek]

/ost he-basic-suite-master el9stream

[michalskrivanek]

/ost he-basic-suite-master

[michalskrivanek]

tested on el9 with ipv4-only and dual stack

[michalskrivanek]

Bit surprised that ip rule can accept IP/MASK instead of IP/CIDR. But looks good

ah, so that's what it does!:-D dunno, but if the sacred OST says green then why would I even check

[michalskrivanek]

Bit surprised that ip rule can accept IP/MASK instead of IP/CIDR. But looks good

ah, so that's what it does!:-D dunno, but if the sacred OST says green then why would I even check

reading documentation despite them trying to document the syntax using formal grammar it doesn't really seem to be defined what format it accepts. In other places ip's PREFIX states it's CIDR. Yet, it indeed works just fine, even on RHEL 8.6:

# ip rule add from 192.168.8.3/255.255.255.0 priority 101 table main
# ip rule
101:    from 192.168.8.3/24 lookup main

eh....so let's proceed...:)

[michalskrivanek]

That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind!

[mnecas]

Bit surprised that ip rule can accept IP/MASK instead of IP/CIDR. But looks good

ah, so that's what it does!:-D dunno, but if the sacred OST says green then why would I even check

reading documentation despite them trying to document the syntax using formal grammar it doesn't really seem to be defined what format it accepts. In other places ip's PREFIX states it's CIDR. Yet, it indeed works just fine, even on RHEL 8.6:

# ip rule add from 192.168.8.3/255.255.255.0 priority 101 table main
# ip rule
101:    from 192.168.8.3/24 lookup main

eh....so let's proceed...:)

Yeah I did same test. Also could not find which format they require/support