Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I modified the TOC file in order to add another entry in the Table of Contents.
The Table of Contents pane does not refresh/update, even when I hit save. Upon
closing and reloading Sigil, the TOC has a few missing entries, and the last
entry does not have an XHTML document tied to it.
Additionally, I noticed that even after closing Sigil, there seems to be a
runaway process running in Task Manager. Sigil.exe *32 takes up about 50% CPU
(CPU 0 @ 30% and CPU 1 @ 80%), and another one of these processes is launched
every time I reopen sigil.
Original comment by NuNu10...@gmail.com
on 18 Dec 2013 at 6:19
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open a epub book created in Calibre
2. Start editing chapters
3. Save after each chapter. (making sure you notice that the progress indicator
comes up showing that its doing a cleanup)
4. Close Sigil.
5. Open Sigil and reopen the book you just edited.
6. Look though each chapter to see if your changes stuck.
7. Hopefully you will notice that Sigil did not save some changes to the
chapters.
What is the expected output?
The changes to the epub should stick.
What do you see instead?
I see a book with minor changes to the fisrt one or two chapters.
What version of the product are you using?
0.7.4 Portable Version
On what operating system?
Windows 7 x64
Please provide any additional information below. If your source file is
required to fully understand the problem, please attach it to this issue.
Read the ReportingIssues wiki page before
submitting!
Im having a similar issue. I was editing a book that was created in Calibre. I
added a footnotes section and started copying the footnotes from various
chapters into the footnotes html document. I also was going though making text
changes to each chapter making sure to save the Epub after making corrections
to each chapter. When I went to open the epub book I noticed that Sigil did
not save my text changes. I was also editing one of the files outside the
program and saving changes to that but it was just for one file.
Original comment by trinsi...@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2014 at 4:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pandoral...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2013 at 1:23