Open KellyCul opened 9 months ago
We cannot hide or folter there. I added the text above describing that Observers are shown there too.
Do we want to hide the view of Members there completely?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:33 AM KellyCul @.***> wrote:
Can we find a way to hide or distinguish observers from the "Members" view? Or can we get rid of this view completely?
I am concerned that people will not go into Workspace>Roster and will rely only on "Members" giving them an inaccurate idea of who should be participating. Worst outcome, potentially leading to IPR issues.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/oasis-dev/it-transformation/issues/63, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAYSAILX2N67ONIM3CKT6TYVSTMFAVCNFSM6AAAAABD2NONN2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE2TINBWG4ZDOMI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- Scott McGrath
Chief Operating Officer
OASIS Open
+1 781-929-7308 Mobile @.*** www.oasis-open.org
I think we should hide it. This is a good time to reinforce good habits.
I see the text you added, but I am not confident that it will be read. I can think of several TCs that will blow right past it and assume the members list is the only list to further what they want to be true.
Agree. I think our riskier course is to leave Observers visible on the Members page especially in a way that might suggest that so-and-so company is actually involved when they are not. I can imagine some - say Martin Chapman - pointing out that some companies would be very upset to have their names displayed there.
Let's remove Members.
Can we find a way to hide or distinguish observers from the "Members" view? Or can we get rid of this view completely?
I am concerned that people will not go into Workspace>Roster and will rely only on "Members" giving them an inaccurate idea of who should be participating. Worst outcome, potentially leading to IPR issues.