oasis-open / cti-stix-slider

OASIS TC Open Repository: The repository cti-stix-slider supports development of a Python application to convert STIX 2.0 content to STIX 1.x content
https://cti-stix-slider.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
21 stars 15 forks source link

Fix import typo in docs #20

Closed awest1339 closed 6 years ago

codecov-io commented 6 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #20 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%. The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #20      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.35%   64.33%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        4879     4879              
==========================================
- Hits         3140     3139       -1     
- Misses       1739     1740       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stix2slider/convert_cyber_observables.py 73.51% <0%> (-0.15%) :arrow_down:

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 956a243...14bf8d4. Read the comment docs.

emmanvg commented 6 years ago

Hey @awest1339 sorry for the delay. In order to incorporate your Pull Request you need to sign an individual CLA here. Once we can verify your submission here we can incorporate your contributions! Let me know if you have any questions.

awest1339 commented 6 years ago

Closing due to ridiculous CLA requirements.

I suggest OASIS think about whether they actually want to be part of the open source community or its more important that they harvest irrelevant PII from potential contributors.

@gtback @rpiazza @robincover

gtback commented 6 years ago

Hey, @awest1339 , sorry the CLA requirements are burdensome. Arguably this change (just fixing a typo) doesn't require a CLA, but we like to have them on file anyway so no one can argue if the contribution is "substantial" enough to warrant one.

Thanks for finding the typo, though!