oasis-open / tac-ontology

OASIS Threat Actor Context (TAC) TC: Creating an ontology for expressing the rich context around Threat Actors. https://github.com/oasis-open/tac-ontology
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
9 stars 4 forks source link

Investigate integration with Open-CTI #36

Closed rhohimer closed 1 year ago

rhohimer commented 1 year ago

OpenCTI is becoming a popular choice of front end. We should investigate the possibility of using a TAC knowledgegraph to support the backend model for OpenCTI.

rhohimer commented 1 year ago

I spent a few minutes reading the OpenCTI website. I thought I was just going to refresh my memory on their status, however, I was surprised at the advances that have been made. It is significant that they are now have a GraphQL API. This merits investigation. This may allow us to communicate between the OpenCTI back-end data model and a Knowledge Graph governed by TAC ontologies and extensions to the TAC ontologies (e.g., TAL)

@TCReg I'll be looking into this more in the near future.

TCReg commented 1 year ago

Interesting, I'll have to check it out.  Thanks.

On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:46:41 PM MST, Ryan Hohimer ***@***.***> wrote:  

I spent a few minutes reading the OpenCTI website. I thought I was just going to refresh my memory on their status, however, I was surprised at the advances that have been made. It is significant that they are now have a GraphQL API. This merits investigation. This may allow us to communicate between the OpenCTI back-end data model and a Knowledge Graph governed by TAC ontologies and extensions to the TAC ontologies (e.g., TAL)

@TCReg I'll be looking into this more in the near future.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

rhohimer commented 1 year ago

I have reviewed the OpenCTI platform with the intension of evaluating the possibility of creating a graph based back-end to the OpenCTI platform which uses the TAC-Ontologies. This Issue is about building a platform that uses the TAC ontologies and not about issues with the TAC-Ontology. Hence I am closing the issue.