lauwers
commented
2 years ago If we did this, we would also need grammar for accessing artifacts at the topology template level. The TOSCA language currently includes the following two mechanisms for referencing artifacts:
- The get_artifact function (which includes a reference to the node type or node template that defines the artifact)
- The ‘operation implementation’ syntax, which either references an artifact by name in the node type or node template, or contains an inline artifact definition, which in turn references the node template or node type that has the artifact.
Neither mechanism can currently be used to reference artifacts in other places.
From: Adam Souzis @.> Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 4:34 AM To: oasis-open/tosca-community-contributions @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: [oasis-open/tosca-community-contributions] TOSCA 2.0: Expand where artifacts can be defined. (Issue #52)
TC consensus seems to be it should be possible to declare artifacts on the topology template not just node templates as in TOSCA 1.3. How about relationships, groups, policies, etc.? And to interfaces?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/oasis-open/tosca-community-contributions/issues/52, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASPLILUF7RNRODKWDNADVLUY7HJ3ANCNFSM5NJANYRQ. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOShttps://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Androidhttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.**@.>>
TC consensus seems to be it should be possible to declare artifacts on the topology template not just node templates as in TOSCA 1.3. How about relationships, groups, policies, etc.? And to interfaces?
(cf TOSCA TC TODO Item 22)